🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing group of nations are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our children's innocence". A law is expected to be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to approve a bill increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for minors except if guardian approval is given. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a useful foundation," stated a leading European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the administration has kept open a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by robust evidence".

Earlier, interest grew behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing dangerous social media material suggests that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, regulation is mostly occurring at the regional level amid national gridlock.

• Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws requiring adult authorization for under-16s to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to mimic this path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Beyond the West, further states are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies strike a more measured position. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could backfire". The body points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

As this international conversation unfolds, the actions of Australia and others demonstrate that policymakers globally are less and less prepared to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.